Caveat Emptor and Journalism
By Mike Silva ~ December 6th, 2008. Filed under: Mike Silva.
Neil Best, in his Q&A with Full Count Pitch, brings up an interesting point about possible conflicts of interest with journalist who work for independent publications and networks. FPC asked Best if this is a problem and how can it be corrected? To quote Neil he said that the “horse is out of the barn” and there is “no solution to any of this except for the consumers of information to understand the dynamics and go the caveat emptor route”.
He couldn’t describe the new landscape of media better. You still have those sanctimonious few that try to hold back everyone in the name of “journalism”. Normally these individuals are unable to compete, for various reasons, with the “wild west” of modern day journalism. You also have the flip side: readers who refuse to critically think for themselves.
Those that advocate codes, legislation, and reader laziness should read Neil’s thoughts and reflect. Whether your a member of the BBWAA, independent writer, or simply have a blog you have a right to report information. The rules of “caveat emptor” 100% apply and should be part of your daily reading experience. Whether you read the NY Times, SNY, YES, or NY Baseball Digest you should read the information and make your own judgments.
That is the way of reporting today, and we are better off for it. Gone are the days we could be “misled” by journalist with an agenda (think Dick Young and Tom Seaver). With increased power comes great responsibility. Some use it wisely, and others don’t. I continue to make my own judgments and will not begrudge the saturation of media.
Whether your in the car dealership, Home Depot, or reading the morning news: Caveat Emptor
