Mike Silva's New York Baseball Digest » Blog Archive » Did the Giants Debunk Moneyball?

Did the Giants Debunk Moneyball?



By Mike Silva ~ November 1st, 2010. Filed under: Mike Silva.


Bad night for Moneyballers, as Tony Siegle, senior advisor of Giants told me, “We’ve shown Moneyball is a bunch of garbage” #MLBless than a minute ago via TweetDeck


I am not sure that is completely an accurate statement, but what the Giants did prove is that good pitching and a hot closer will certainly put you in a position to win in the postseason.

Paul DePodesta did say his definition of “Moneyball” is finding undervalued players. I believe two key contributors,  Juan Uribe and Andres Torres, might fall into that category.  Again, I believe incorporating aspects of advanced statistical analysis into decision making is essential to survive in the modern game.

Remember, the MLB playoffs is a tournament. You get there and anything can happen regardless of Moneyball.

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook

The following two tabs change content below.
Mike Silva has hosted sports shows on 107.1 FM Champions ESPN Radio Long Island ,1240 AM WGBB , Blog Talk Radio and live from Mickey Mantle’s Restaurant. He’s also built and maintained two popular social media hubs: New York Baseball Digest and Sports Media Watchdog. Mike has broken national and local stories, as well as been mentioned on the YES Network, SNY.tv, WFAN, Sports Illustrated, ESPN, NY Daily News, New York Magazine, Journal News and the NY Post. Contact Mike professionally at mikesilvamedia.com

Latest posts by Mike Silva (see all)

1 Response to Did the Giants Debunk Moneyball?

  1. Mister D

    What most people mean, or should mean, by “Moneyball” is using advanced statistics (ie SABR stats) to find undervalued players. However, any sabermetricial will tell you 4 games is a small sample size and doesn’t prove a damn thing. The inconsistent offense we’ve seen (hot Yankee bats go cold against Texas, Texas hot bats go cold against SF, SF cold bats heat up in WS) only underscoes the crapshoot nature of the post season. This isn’t to take away from the team that wins (as a Yankee fan, I’d be foolish to do that) – they did it, they deserve it – but when you have closely matched teams, its more a matter of who’s gotten hot than who’s better.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.