Mike Silva's New York Baseball Digest » Blog Archive » Barajas: Strong Addition

Barajas: Strong Addition



By Howard Megdal ~ February 24th, 2010. Filed under: Howard Megdal.

No, I don’t think the Mets just clinched the pennant with the news that catcher Rod Barajas is officially on board. But I do think they managed, for comparitively little money, to improve a starting position significantly in 2010. And that’s terrific news, particularly against an offseason backdrop that has provided very little reason to cheer.

Let’s start with the offense. Barajas posted an OPS of .661 last year. How good is that? Well, Omir Santos was at .688. And if every other indicator didn’t suggest that Santos will come down while Barajas will improve, that would be a problem.

But Barajsd had a .226 BABIP last season, without a huge drop in his line drive rate. Almost certainly, his three-year average OPS of .690- right in line with his career OPS of .691- is far closer to what the Mets can expect in 2010.

As for Santos, his .688 OPS in 281 at-bats last year was well above his career .652 OPS in the minor leagues, in 2,229 at-bats. Between the two stats, the latter seems like a far better indicator of his true talent. And this is reflected by Dan Szymborski’s ZIPS projection for Santos at .631. Baseball Prospectus’ PECOTA has him at .650, with CHONE checking in at .655. Honestly, given his minor league track record, only ZIPS seems close, and over a full season starting, I’d have expected Santos to fail to reach any of these marks.

PECOTA, by contrast, has Barajas at .746- if he hits that well, it would represent the best OPS by a starting Mets catcher since Paul Lo Duca’s .783 back in 2006. It would be plenty of hitting for the position- and unlike Santos, questions don’t exist about Barajas’ defense.

And best of all, it represents a similar- if not more significant- uprgade than that of Bengie Molina, which would have cost the Mets two years and $10 million. For a fraction of the cost- 20 percent, if Barajas reaches all of his incentives, and less than 10 percent of it in guaranteed money- the Mets have solved their catching problem for 2010 without blocking Josh Thole in 2011.

If the Mets could only see that a similar solution at second base still awaits them- Felipe Lopez, sitting in the corner of the dance without a partner- they’ll really be getting somewhere, addressing the black holes on the team, inexpensively on short-term deals. But it’s a start.

Howard Megdal is the Editor-in-Chief of The Perpetual Post. He covers baseball, basketball and soccer for Capital New York, MLBTradeRumors.com, New York Baseball Digest and has written for ESPN.com as well as numerous other publications. He is the Poet Laureate for SBNation New York. His book about Jewish baseball players, “The Baseball Talmud,” is available for purchase on Amazon.com and wherever books are sold. His next book, "Taking The Field", is available for pre-order on Amazon.com and will publish in May 2011.
Howard Megdal
View all posts by Howard Megdal
Howards website

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook

3 Responses to Barajas: Strong Addition

  1. GravediggerHebner

    I agree with all your observations on Barajas and the Mets catching situation. I was so pleased to read an article that actually gave the Mets credit for a transaction…then I got to the last paragraph.

    No one loves Luis Castillo and no one should. But comparing solving the catching situation by signing Barajas to solving the 2B situation by signing Lopez is specious.

    Barajas knocked a guy out of a position (and likely off the roster) with no significant attribute and no significant salary. Santos can simply disappear off the face of the earth and there are no repercussions.

    But with Castillo, it’s not that simple. He is owed $12 million over the next 2 years. What have the Mets done under the Wilpon/Minaya tandem to make anyone think they will just absorb a $12 million hit? Nothing I can think of. It would be radical.

    Unlike with Santos the Mets can’t just send Castillo to AAA or turn him into a back up. His contract is bad no doubt. He can still get on base at a very good rate so while his fielding is poor he is not completely useless. And he’s too expensive for any reasonable follower of the team to expect them to just throw him away. For better or worse, we’re stuck with him and the sooner we all realize that the sooner we can focus on other aspects of the roster and the organization.

  2. Howard Megdal

    The Mets don’t need to turn Castillo into a backup. Castillo’s performance has already turned him into a backup. Simply sending him out there anyway doesn’t make him a starting-caliber player.
    I agree, though, the Mets haven’t recognized a sunk cost. Doesn’t mean they shouldn’t, or that I won’t point out that they should.

  3. R U Kidding

    If you can get Lopez at 2-3 million is that going to kill the Mets? 130-140 million dollar payroll 2-3 million more doesn’t seem like much.

Leave a Reply